Discussion:
regarding xpde
Chakkaradeep C C
2006-03-16 10:19:58 UTC
Permalink
hi all,

i was going thru lightweight desktops available and i got few like
FluxBox,Xfce and Xpde.

Is Xpde the right approach in Linux?...can somebody mimic Windows XP
interface and make lookalike and still M$ be silent?..is there no licensing
issues?...

If Xpde is good and worth a try, should yoper try to build in it?

--
Regards,
Chaks,
Yoper Ltd.
http://www.yoper.com
http://www.yoper.com/forum
--
The main aim of communication is clarity and simplicity. Simplicity means
focussed effort.
Tobias Gerschner
2006-03-16 10:23:14 UTC
Permalink
Hi,
Post by Chakkaradeep C C
hi all,
i was going thru lightweight desktops available and i got few like
FluxBox,Xfce and Xpde.
Is Xpde the right approach in Linux?...can somebody mimic Windows XP
interface and make lookalike and still M$ be silent?..is there no licensing
issues?...
If Xpde is good and worth a try, should yoper try to build in it?
There's also the question , who`s actually doing it :)

regards

--
Tobias Gerschner
Member of Board of Yoper Ltd. NZ

Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Willing is not enough; we must do.
Chakkaradeep C C
2006-03-16 10:33:22 UTC
Permalink
Hi Tobias and All,
Post by Chakkaradeep C C
Hi,
Post by Chakkaradeep C C
hi all,
i was going thru lightweight desktops available and i got few like
FluxBox,Xfce and Xpde.
Is Xpde the right approach in Linux?...can somebody mimic Windows XP
interface and make lookalike and still M$ be silent?..is there no
licensing
Post by Chakkaradeep C C
issues?...
If Xpde is good and worth a try, should yoper try to build in it?
There's also the question , who`s actually doing it :)
anywayz i can try locally in my machine....

regards
Post by Chakkaradeep C C
--
Tobias Gerschner
Member of Board of Yoper Ltd. NZ
Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Willing is not enough; we must do.
_______________________________________________
yoper-dev mailing list
https://morpheus.pingos.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/yoper-dev
--
Regards,
Chaks,
Yoper Ltd.
http://www.yoper.com
http://www.yoper.com/forum
--
The main aim of communication is clarity and simplicity. Simplicity means
focussed effort.
Chakkaradeep C C
2006-03-16 10:36:49 UTC
Permalink
Hi all,
Post by Chakkaradeep C C
Hi,
Post by Chakkaradeep C C
hi all,
i was going thru lightweight desktops available and i got few like
FluxBox,Xfce and Xpde.
Is Xpde the right approach in Linux?...can somebody mimic Windows XP
interface and make lookalike and still M$ be silent?..is there no
licensing
Post by Chakkaradeep C C
issues?...
If Xpde is good and worth a try, should yoper try to build in it?
There's also the question , who`s actually doing it :)
and i also want to add few things,

1) Xpde is jsut in the Beta Stage.
2) We dont have proper apps for configuring and other stuffs as how other
lightweight desktops have
3) I personally feel Xfce can be easily be used as the lightweight desktop
optional to KDE or Gnome.
4) There are so many plugins available for Xfce to make it wonderful.In my
Yoper, Xfce does not take much time to load KDE apps too..so thats also an
advantage.

comments are invited....

regards
Post by Chakkaradeep C C
--
Tobias Gerschner
Member of Board of Yoper Ltd. NZ
Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Willing is not enough; we must do.
_______________________________________________
yoper-dev mailing list
https://morpheus.pingos.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/yoper-dev
--
Regards,
Chaks,
Yoper Ltd.
http://www.yoper.com
http://www.yoper.com/forum
--
The main aim of communication is clarity and simplicity. Simplicity means
focussed effort.
Walter Hieber
2006-03-16 12:25:47 UTC
Permalink
I have tried xpde several times and although it looks similar, because of
licensing it will never be able to achieve the goal of being a XP replacment
for those who want that. Its a neat project and they have done a good job of
mimicing XP but as limited as it is, it would never be a good replacement
for KDE even if it were a perfect duplicate of XP. Hoever, nothing wrong
with having it in the repo. Just my 2 cents.
Walter
-----Original Message-----
From: yoper-dev-bounces-***@public.gmane.org
[mailto:yoper-dev-bounces-***@public.gmane.org]On Behalf Of Chakkaradeep C C
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 5:37 AM
To: yoper-dev - open minded discussion
Subject: Re: [yoper-dev] regarding xpde


Hi all,


On 3/16/06, Tobias Gerschner <tobias.gerschner-***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
Hi,
Post by Chakkaradeep C C
hi all,
i was going thru lightweight desktops available and i got few like
FluxBox,Xfce and Xpde.
Is Xpde the right approach in Linux?...can somebody mimic Windows XP
interface and make lookalike and still M$ be silent?..is there no
licensing
Post by Chakkaradeep C C
issues?...
If Xpde is good and worth a try, should yoper try to build in it?
There's also the question , who`s actually doing it :)

and i also want to add few things,

1) Xpde is jsut in the Beta Stage.
2) We dont have proper apps for configuring and other stuffs as how other
lightweight desktops have
3) I personally feel Xfce can be easily be used as the lightweight desktop
optional to KDE or Gnome.
4) There are so many plugins available for Xfce to make it wonderful.In my
Yoper, Xfce does not take much time to load KDE apps too..so thats also an
advantage.

comments are invited....



regards

--
Tobias Gerschner
Member of Board of Yoper Ltd. NZ

Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Willing is not enough; we must do.
_______________________________________________
yoper-dev mailing list
yoper-dev-***@public.gmane.org
https://morpheus.pingos.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/yoper-dev




--
Regards,
Chaks,
Yoper Ltd.
http://www.yoper.com
http://www.yoper.com/forum
--
The main aim of communication is clarity and simplicity. Simplicity means
focussed effort.
mark
2006-03-16 15:35:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chakkaradeep C C
Hi all,
Post by Chakkaradeep C C
Hi,
Post by Chakkaradeep C C
hi all,
i was going thru lightweight desktops available and i got few like
FluxBox,Xfce and Xpde.
Is Xpde the right approach in Linux?...can somebody mimic Windows XP
interface and make lookalike and still M$ be silent?..is there no
licensing
Post by Chakkaradeep C C
issues?...
If Xpde is good and worth a try, should yoper try to build in it?
There's also the question , who`s actually doing it :)
and i also want to add few things,
1) Xpde is jsut in the Beta Stage.
2) We dont have proper apps for configuring and other stuffs as how other
lightweight desktops have
3) I personally feel Xfce can be easily be used as the lightweight desktop
optional to KDE or Gnome.
4) There are so many plugins available for Xfce to make it wonderful.In my
Yoper, Xfce does not take much time to load KDE apps too..so thats also an
advantage.
comments are invited....
regards
I would go for KDE and Gnome as the main choices. Then XFCE and Fluxbox for
the lighter WM options. Those are the most widely used for a reason ;)
Xpde - why would we want to look like an inferior OS? Just my view of
course ;) Yes, it looks neat - but if people want XP, then they can dual
boot with XP. You can customise KDE to resemble XP if you really must - to a
degree anyway. KDE is miles neater than XP in my view - I am perhaps used to
KDE so my view is slanted. XP is a confusing mess to me! I cannot use it or
find anything on it - luckily I only ever see XP on repair jobs for other
people.
Mark

Fabian M. Schindler
2006-03-16 12:28:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chakkaradeep C C
hi all,
i was going thru lightweight desktops available and i got few like
FluxBox,Xfce and Xpde.
Is Xpde the right approach in Linux?...can somebody mimic Windows XP
interface and make lookalike and still M$ be silent?..is there no
licensing issues?...
If Xpde is good and worth a try, should yoper try to build in it?
I guess there will definitely be licensing issues with Microsoft if you
copy their look&feel. For just the same reason, Macs OSX look cannot be
included (unless you have deeeeeep pockets). And furthermore: This is a
Linux distro, not a WinXP clone, isn't it? I don't see a reason to
follow Microsofts or Apples "dictatorship" regarding the
desktop-look. :)
Post by Chakkaradeep C C
--
Regards,
Chaks,
Yoper Ltd.
http://www.yoper.com
http://www.yoper.com/forum
--
The main aim of communication is clarity and simplicity. Simplicity
means focussed effort.
_______________________________________________
yoper-dev mailing list
https://morpheus.pingos.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/yoper-dev
Chakkaradeep C C
2006-03-16 15:00:39 UTC
Permalink
Hi all,
Post by Fabian M. Schindler
Post by Chakkaradeep C C
hi all,
i was going thru lightweight desktops available and i got few like
FluxBox,Xfce and Xpde.
Is Xpde the right approach in Linux?...can somebody mimic Windows XP
interface and make lookalike and still M$ be silent?..is there no
licensing issues?...
If Xpde is good and worth a try, should yoper try to build in it?
I guess there will definitely be licensing issues with Microsoft if you
copy their look&feel. For just the same reason, Macs OSX look cannot be
included (unless you have deeeeeep pockets). And furthermore: This is a
Linux distro, not a WinXP clone, isn't it? I don't see a reason to
follow Microsofts or Apples "dictatorship" regarding the
desktop-look. :)
Ok, the same thoughts were running in my mind.So we can pull down the Xpde
build in Yoper?.

And i have seen that in Windows Vista, the UI is also copyrighted, so it is
better to stay aloof from all these kinds issues and enjoy linux :)
Post by Fabian M. Schindler
--
Post by Chakkaradeep C C
Regards,
Chaks,
Yoper Ltd.
http://www.yoper.com
http://www.yoper.com/forum
--
The main aim of communication is clarity and simplicity. Simplicity
means focussed effort.
_______________________________________________
yoper-dev mailing list
https://morpheus.pingos.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/yoper-dev
_______________________________________________
yoper-dev mailing list
https://morpheus.pingos.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/yoper-dev
--
Regards,
Chaks,
Yoper Ltd.
http://www.yoper.com
http://www.yoper.com/forum
--
The main aim of communication is clarity and simplicity. Simplicity means
focussed effort.
Loading...